eekim.com: EEK Speaks

Sun, Nov 12, 2006

Learning and Collaboration #

On a warm summer evening in Virginia last July, I sat on MarciaConner's porch and wondered aloud whether we were in the same business. Marcia cares about collaboration, but she's nuts about learning. If she doesn't hear the word "learning" in the context of projects she's involved with, alarm bells go off in her head. (LJ7)

I'm equally passionate about collaboration and learning, but I can talk about my work without ever mentioning the latter. My reasoning, as I explained that night, was that good collaboration encompasses learning, and the best way to learn is to collaborate. You can't talk about "collaboration" without also thinking about "learning." (LJ8)

DougEngelbart often says that high-performance communities are experts at CoDIAK -- collectively developing, integrating, and applying knowledge. I hate the acronym, because I think it's unnecessarily esoteric. What CoDIAK boils down to is: (LJ9)

Learn. (LJA)
Share and apply what you know. (LJB)
Repeat early and often. (LJC)

There's that "learn" word again. (LJD)

I still believe that collaboration encompasses learning, but I've changed my mind about whether it's important to explicitly mention learning in the context of my work. Marcia, of course, is to blame. We were chatting in the attic of a colleague's home last Friday, with her two year old son, Clarke, playing on the floor as we talked, and our conversation again drifted towards learning. I was talking about a project I'm involved with, and I explained that while it still felt important, I wasn't learning any more. (LJE)

As soon as I said it, I laughed to myself, because it sounded like something that Marcia would have complained about. Yesterday, as I was reading AllisonFine's Momentum, a book that Marcia gave me, I was again struck by how important learning is to my work. I believe very strongly in defining projects concretely and getting things done, but I refuse to take on a client who doesn't care about learning. I expect to learn from my work, and I expect my clients to want to learn as part of our collaboration. This is not a requirement to be in this business. There are plenty of projects where clients don't give a damn about learning. They just want you to get the work done. I've been offered these kinds of projects in the past, and the work itself is often intellectual, enjoyable, and well-paying. I still turn it down. My mission is to help people learn about collaboration, and I won't work on projects where that's not happening. (LJF)

I've already made it a practice to describe BlueOxenAssociates' long-term goal as building and facilitating a LearningCommunity centered around collaboration. I could just as easily have chosen Engelbart's term, ImprovementCommunity, or EtienneWenger's term, CommunityOfPractice, but I chose PeterSenge's instead, and the fact that "learning" is there was a major reason why. I'm currently in the process of revamping our web site, and I plan on making "learning" a more explicit part of our message. (LJG)

/collaboration | Posted at 9:59am

Comments

Comments disabled until future notice. If you'd like to contact me, use my i-name (=eekim).